2006 BMW F 650GS vs 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2006 BMW F 650GS 2006 BMW F 650GS

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder
Power
37 kW / 50 hp @ 6500 rpm
Top Speed
183.4 km/h / 114 mph
Weight
423.3 pounds
2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Single cylinder
Power
42.1 hp / 31 kW @ 7000 rpm
Top Speed
93.0 mph
Weight
428.0 pounds
Full Specifications
General
Year20062008 - 09
MakeBMW-
ModelF 650GS-
Colours-Ebony, Sunbeam Red, Oriental Blue
Make ModelBMW F 650GSKawasaki KLR 650
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (mm)-206 mm
Ground Clearance (in.)-8.1 inches
Seat Height780 mm / 30.7 in.889 mm / 35 in
Wheelbase1479 mm / 58.2 in.1480 mm / 58.3 in
Ground Clearance-210 mm / 8.3 in
Height1265 mm / 49.8 in.1350 mm / 53.1 in
Length2175 mm / 85.6 in.2295 mm / 90.4 in
Width910 mm / 35.8 in.960 mm / 37.8 in
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (Quarts)2.43 US quarts with filter change-
Oil Capacity (l)2.3 litres with filter change-
Dry Weight175.4 kg / 386.7 lbs.175.5 kg / 387.0 lbs
Fuel Capacity17.3 Litres / 4.6 US gal.23 Litres / 5.8 US gal.
Coolant Capacity1.3 litres-
Maximum Load / GVWR380 kg / 837.8 lbs. maximum permissible total weight-
Oil Capacity2.3 litres with filter change-
Wet Weight192 kg / 423.3 lbs. (BMW road-ready specification)194 kg / 432 lbs
Performance
Maximum RPM7400 rpm7800
Top Speed183.4 km/h / 114 mph149.7 km/h / 93.0 mph
Acceleration (0-100 km/h)-5.880 seconds
Max Power37 kW / 50 hp @ 6500 rpm42.1 hp / 31 kW @ 7000 rpm
Max Torque60 Nm / 6.12 kgf-m / 44.25 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm47 Nm / 4.7 kgf-m @ 5000 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.2828 HP/kg0.2057 HP/kg
Standing Start ¼ Mile13.4 sec14.400 seconds
Engine
Engine TypeSingle cylinderSingle cylinder
Stroke44
Fuel Reserve (l)4.5 litres, approximately-
Fuel Reserve (gal.)1.19 US gal.-
Displacement (cc)-651.00 cc
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.9 x 3.3 inches
Fuel Control-DOHC
Displacement (ci)-39.72 cubic inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)-100.0 x 83.0 mm
Displacement652 cc / 39.8 cub. in.651 cc / 39.7 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinderFour stroke, single cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic intake pipe injection / BMW engine management, dual ignitionCarburettor. Keihin CVK 40
Bore x Stroke100 x 83mm100 x 83 mm.
Catalytic ConverterThree-way catalytic converter-
Compression Ratio11.5:19.8:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
Engine ManagementBMW BMS-C II-
Engine Oil Specification-Semi-Synthetic, 10W/40
ExhaustStainless-steel exhaust system with three-way catalytic converter-
Fuel Consumption4.7 L/100 km / 50.0 US mpg / 60.1 Imp mpg-
Fuel Consumption (Claimed)3.2 L/100 km at steady 90 km/h; 4.3 L/100 km at steady 120 km/h-
Fuel InductionElectronic intake-port fuel injectionKeihin CVK40
Fuel Range370.2 kms / 230 miles-
Fuel ReserveApprox. 4.5 Litres / 1.2 US gal.-
Fuel TypeUnleaded petrol, minimum 91 RON-
Idle Speed1500 rpm-
IgnitionElectronically controlled twin-spark ignitionTransistorized
LubricationDry sump Forced lubrication (wet sump)
Spark Plug-NGK, DPR 8EA/9
StarterElectricElectric
Valve SystemDOHC, four valves4
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity12V / 12Ah-
Drivetrain
Chain TypeO-ring chain-
ClutchMultiple-disc clutch in oil bath, mechanically operated Wet multi-disc, cable operation
Final DriveChainSealed Chain
Final Drive Ratio2.938:1 (47/16) 2.867 (43/15)
Gear Ratios1st 2.75 / 2nd 1.75 / 3rd 1.31 / 4th 1.05 / 5th 0.88:11st 2.266 (34/15) 2nd 1.444 (26/18) 3rd 1.136 (25/22) 4th 0.954 (21/22) 5th 0.791 (19/24)
Gearbox5-speed5-speed
Number of Chain Links112 links-
Primary Drive Ratios- 2.272 / 75/33
Primary Gear Ratio1.946:1 (72/37)-
Sprocket Front and RearFront 16 teeth / rear 47 teeth-
Transmission / Drive5 Speed 5 Speed
Chassis
Fork Tube Size (mm)41 mm-
Fork Tube Size (in.)1.61 inches-
Frame TypeBridge-type steel section frame with bolted-on rear sectionSemi-double Cradle Made of high-tech, round-section, high-tensile steel
Suspension - Front41mm Telescopic fork with stabilizer bridge41mm Air-adjustable forks,
Suspension - RearSpring setting and rebound stage damping continuously adjustableUni-Trak® linkage, 5-way preload shock absorber with 4way rebound damping.
Frame - RearBolted-on rear frame section-
Rake29.2° 28.0°
Steering Head Angle60.8°-
SwingarmSteel box-section double-sided swingarm-
Trail113 mm / 4.45 in.112 mm / 4.4 in
Wheel Travel - Front170 mm / 6.69 in.200 mm / 7.8 in
Wheel Travel - Rear165 mm / 6.50 in.185 mm / 7.2 in
Electrical Systems
AlternatorThree-phase alternator 400W-
Battery Voltage12 V-
Headlight - BulbH4 halogen, 12 V, 60/55 W-
Headlight - TypeHalogen-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)11.8 inches11.0 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)9.4 inches9.4 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)240 mm240 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)300 mm280 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle ∅300mm disc, 2 piston caliperSingle 280mm disc 2 piston caliper
Brakes - RearSingle ∅240mm disc, 1 piston caliperSingle 203mm disc 1 piston caliper
ABSOptional BMW Motorrad ABS, switchable off-
Brake Fluid TypeDOT 4-
Rims - Front2.50 x 19 in.-
Rims - Rear3.00 x 17 in.-
Tyre Pressure - Front1.9 bar solo; 2.1 bar fully loaded (cold)-
Tyre Pressure - Rear2.1 bar solo; 2.3 bar fully loaded (cold)-
Tyres - Front100/90-19 90/90 -21
Tyres - Rear130/80-17 130/80 -17
WheelsWire spoke wheels-
Wheels - Front2.50 x 19-
Wheels - Rear3.00 x 17-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2006 BMW F 650GS

The 2006 BMW F 650GS edges out the 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 thanks to its higher torque, lower seat height, fuel injection and standard ABS. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2006 BMW F 650GS - Advantages

  • Higher torque: 60 Nm vs 47 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
  • Lower seat height: 780 mm vs 889 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
  • Standard ABS: A meaningful safety advantage in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.

2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 - Advantages

  • More rear wheel travel: 185 mm vs 165 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 200 mm vs 170 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2006 BMW F 650GS vs 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2006 BMW F 650GS or the 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650?
The 2006 BMW F 650GS has the lower seat at 780 mm, making it more accessible. The 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 sits higher at 889 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Does the 2006 BMW F 650GS or 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 have ABS?
The 2006 BMW F 650GS is listed with ABS as standard. The 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 does not list ABS. ABS provides a meaningful safety benefit in emergency braking on wet or loose surfaces.
Which should I buy, the 2006 BMW F 650GS or the 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650?
Both are strong choices. The 2006 BMW F 650GS has the edge in higher torque and lower seat height, while the 2009 Kawasaki KLR 650 stands out for higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.