2014 Yamaha WR 450F vs 2013 KTM 500 XC-W

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2014 Yamaha WR 450F 2014 Yamaha WR 450F

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Four stroke, Single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves
Power
58 hp / 42.3 kW @ 9000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
122 kg / 268 lbs
2013 KTM 500 XC-W 2013 KTM 500 XC-W

Enduro / Off-Road

Engine
Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
114 kg / 251 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year2013 - 142012 - 13
Make ModelYamaha WR450FKTM 500 XC-W
Dimensions
Seat Height960 mm / 37.8 in970 mm / 38.19 in
Wheelbase1475 mm / 58.1 in1482 mm / 58.3 in
Ground Clearance335 mm / 13.2 in345 mm / 13.58 in
Height1275 mm / 50.2 in-
Length2315 mm / 91.1 in-
Width825 mm / 32.5 in-
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight112.5 kg / 268 lbs-
Fuel Capacity7.2 Litres / 1.9 US gal8.5 L / 2.2 US gal / 1,9 Imp gal
Oil Capacity1.2 L / 2.5 US pt-
Wet Weight122 kg / 268 lbs114 kg / 251 lbs
Performance
Max Power58 hp / 42.3 kW @ 9000 rpm-
Max Torque5.0 kgf-m 36.2 ft-lb @ 7500 rpm-
Engine
Displacement449 cc / 27.4 cu in510.4 cc / 31.1 cu-in
Engine DetailFour stroke, Single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valvesFour stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder
Bore x Stroke95 x 63.4 mm95 x 72 mm
Compression Ratio12.3:111.9:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooledLiquid cooled
ExhaustSingle, upswept, under seat-
Fuel Induction39mm Keihin FCR flat-slide throttle position sensorKeihin MX FCR 39
IgnitionCDIContactless controlled fully electronic ignition with digital ignition adjustment, type Kokusan
LubricationDry sump-
StarterElectric & kickKick and electric
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-discMultidisc clutch in oil bath, hydraulically activated
Final DriveChainChain 5/8 x 1/4"
Final Drive Ratio-13:50
Primary Drive Ratios-32:76
Transmission / Drive5-Speed, constant mesh6 Speed
Chassis
Frame TypeAluminium bilateral beamCentral double-cradle type 25CrMo4
Suspension - Front48mm Upside down telescopic forkWP-USD ø 48 mm
Suspension - RearSwingarm, link suspension, mono shockWP PDS-Federbein
Rake27°-
Steering Head Angle-63.5°
Trail115 mm / 4.5 in-
Wheel Travel - Front300 mm / 11.8 in300 mm / 11.8 in
Wheel Travel - Rear305 mm / 12.0 in335 mm / 13.1 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontHydraulic single 250 mm disc 4 piston caliperSingle 260 mm disc
Brakes - RearSingle 245 mm disc 2 piston caliperSingle 220 mm disc
Tyres - Front80/100-21 51P90/90 - 21
Tyres - Rear120/90-18 65P120/90 - 18
WheelsAluminium alloy, laced spokes-

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 KTM 500 XC-W

The 2013 KTM 500 XC-W edges out the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F thanks to its lighter kerb weight and higher rear wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2014 Yamaha WR 450F - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2014 Yamaha WR 450F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 KTM 500 XC-W - Advantages

  • Lighter: 114 kg vs 122 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
  • More rear wheel travel: 335 mm vs 305 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.

2014 Yamaha WR 450F vs 2013 KTM 500 XC-W - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F and 2013 KTM 500 XC-W?
The 2014 Yamaha WR 450F uses Four stroke, Single cylinder, DOHC, 5 valves, while the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W is powered by Four stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F or the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W?
The 2013 KTM 500 XC-W is lighter at 114 kg compared to 122 kg for the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F - a difference of 8 kg. This is a small difference unlikely to be a deciding factor in everyday riding.
Which should I buy, the 2014 Yamaha WR 450F or the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W?
Both are strong choices. The 2014 Yamaha WR 450F has its own strengths, while the 2013 KTM 500 XC-W stands out for lighter kerb weight and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.