2002 Yamaha PW50 vs 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Comments | - | Power reduction kit available. |
| Colours | - | White/grey/yellow |
| Warranty | - | 2 Years |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 4.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 105 mm | 168 mm |
| Wheelbase (in.) | 33.7 inches | - |
| Seat Height | 485 mm / 19.1 in. | 558 mm / 22.0 in. |
| Wheelbase | - | 1032 mm / 40.6 in. |
| Height | 715 mm / 28.1 in. | - |
| Length | 1,245 mm / 49.0 in. | - |
| Width | 575 mm / 22.6 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Oil Capacity (Quarts) | - | 0.95 US quarts |
| Oil Capacity (l) | - | 0.90 litres |
| Dry Weight | 37 kg / 81.6 lbs | 40 kg / 88.2 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | - | 2.30 litres / 0.61 US gallons |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | 3.80 | - |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | 0.0730 HP/kg | - |
| Engine |
| Displacement (ci) | 2.99 cubic inches | 2.99 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Displacement (cc) | 49.00 cc | 49.0 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 1.6 x 1.5 inches | 1.6 x 1.6 inches |
| Stroke | 2 | 2-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 40.0 x 39.2 mm | 39.5 x 40.0 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 6.6:1 | - |
| Engine Lubrication | - | Mixture oil lubrication |
| Ignition | - | Seletra 2p D36 |
| Starter | - | Kick |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Centrifugal clutch (adjustable) |
| Final Drive | - | Chain (final drive) |
| Gearbox | - | Automatic |
| Primary Drive | - | 1/2 x 3/16´ chain |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Chrome-molybdenum steel central-tube |
| Suspension - Front | - | XACT 35 WP Upside-Down fork, Ø 35 mm |
| Suspension - Rear | - | XACT WP PDS mono shock |
| Rake | - | 22.6° |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 60 mm / 2.4 in. | 100 mm / 3.9 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 50 mm / 2.0 in. | 147 mm / 5.8 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | Expanding brake | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Expanding brake | Single disc |
Verdict
⚖️
Too close to call
The 2002 Yamaha PW50 and the 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.
Key Differences
2002 Yamaha PW50 - Advantages
- ⚖️Lighter: 37 kg vs 40 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
- 📏Lower seat height: 485 mm vs 558 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 168 mm vs 105 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
- 🔄More rear wheel travel: 147 mm vs 50 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
- 🔄More front wheel travel: 100 mm vs 60 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.
2002 Yamaha PW50 vs 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 2002 Yamaha PW50 and 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini?
The 2002 Yamaha PW50 uses Single cylinder, while the 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini is powered by Single cylinder, two-stroke. This is a fundamental difference - the 2002 Yamaha PW50 is a four-stroke engine while the 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini runs a two-stroke, resulting in very different power delivery, maintenance requirements, and riding character.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2002 Yamaha PW50 or the 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini?
The 2002 Yamaha PW50 has the lower seat at 485 mm, making it more accessible. The 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini sits higher at 558 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2002 Yamaha PW50 or the 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini?
Both are strong choices. The 2002 Yamaha PW50 has the edge in lighter kerb weight and lower seat height, while the 2023 Husqvarna TC 50 Mini stands out for greater ground clearance and higher rear wheel travel. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.