2011 Yamaha EC-03 vs 2012 Yamaha CygnusX

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2011 Yamaha EC-03 2011 Yamaha EC-03

Scooter

Engine
Electric
Power
N/A
Top Speed
45.0 km/h / 28.0 mph
Weight
56 kg / 123.5 lbs
2012 Yamaha CygnusX 2012 Yamaha CygnusX

Scooter

Engine
Single cylinder, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
264.6 pounds
Full Specifications
General
ColoursWhite/black, BlackSilver, white, black
Warranty6 Month (Limited Factory Warranty)6 Month (Limited Factory Warranty)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)4.3 inches4.4 inches
Storage-Full-size helmet storage under the dual seat. Glovebox in the knee-panel
Ground Clearance (mm)110 mm113 mm
Seat Height745 mm / 29.3 in.785 mm / 30.9 in.
Wheelbase-1,295 mm / 51.0 in.
Height990 mm / 39.0 in.1,186 mm / 46.7 in.
Length1,565 mm / 61.6 in.1,855 mm / 73.0 in.
Width600 mm / 23.6 in.685 mm / 27.0 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight56 kg / 123.5 lbs112 kg / 246.9 lbs
Fuel Capacity14.38 litres / 3.80 gallons7.10 litres / 1.88 gallons
Wet Weight-120.0 kg / 264.6 lbs
Performance
Top Speed45.0 km/h / 28.0 mph-
Max Torque9.60 Nm (1.0 kgf-m or 7.1 ft.lbs) @ 2809.30 Nm (0.9 kgf-m or 6.9 ft.lbs) @ 7500
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.0336 HP/kg0.0958 HP/kg
Engine
Displacement (cc)-125.00 cc
Displacement (ci)-7.63 cubic inches
Bore x Stroke (in,)3.3 x 2.5 inches2.1 x 2.3 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)83.0 x 64.5 mm52.4 x 57.9 mm
Engine TypeElectricSingle cylinder, four-stroke
Fuel ControlSingle Overhead Cams (SOHC)SOHC
Fuel SystemCarburettor. Mikuni 33mm BSRInjection
Compression Ratio9.2:110.0:1
Engine Lubrication-Wet sump
IgnitionDC - CDIDC-CDI
StarterElectricElectric & kick
Drivetrain
ClutchEngine Braking-
Final DriveShaft drive (cardan)Belt
GearboxAutomaticAutomatic
Primary Drive2WD; Yamaha Ultramatic® V-Belt / Forward, Neut.,Rev.V-Belt Automatic
Chassis
Frame Typealuminum frame-
Suspension - FrontCartridge forkTelescopic fork
Suspension - RearMono shock, SwingarmUnit swing
Wheel Travel - Front-147 mm / 5.8 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear-193 mm / 7.6 in.
Electrical Systems
Instrumentation-Speedometer, odometer and fuel gauge
Lighting systemDual 30W Krypton Multi-reflector Headlights and 21/5W Brake lightDual 30W Krypton multireflector headlights and 21/5W brakelight
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)150 mm150 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)5.9 inches5.9 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)95 mm216 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)3.7 inches8.5 inches
Brakes - FrontDouble discSingle disc
Brakes - RearExpanding brake (drum brake)Expanding brake (drum brake)
Tyres - Front25/8-12110/70-12
Tyres - Rear60/100-R12120/70-12

Verdict

Winner on specs

2011 Yamaha EC-03

The 2011 Yamaha EC-03 edges out the 2012 Yamaha CygnusX thanks to its lower seat height and dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2011 Yamaha EC-03 - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 745 mm vs 785 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2012 Yamaha CygnusX - Advantages

  • Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.

2011 Yamaha EC-03 vs 2012 Yamaha CygnusX - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2011 Yamaha EC-03 and 2012 Yamaha CygnusX?
The 2011 Yamaha EC-03 uses Electric, while the 2012 Yamaha CygnusX is powered by Single cylinder, four-stroke.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2011 Yamaha EC-03 or the 2012 Yamaha CygnusX?
The 2011 Yamaha EC-03 has the lower seat at 745 mm, making it more accessible. The 2012 Yamaha CygnusX sits higher at 785 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2011 Yamaha EC-03 or the 2012 Yamaha CygnusX?
Both are strong choices. The 2011 Yamaha EC-03 has the edge in lower seat height and dual front discs, while the 2012 Yamaha CygnusX stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.