1992 Vespa 200 Cosa vs 2001 BMW C1 200
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 1988 - 92 | - |
| Make Model | Vespa 200 Cosa | - |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | - | 700 mm / 27.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1270 mm / 50 in | 1,488 mm / 58.6 in. |
| Ground Clearance | 150 mm / 5.9 in | - |
| Height | 1070 mm | - |
| Length | 1800 mm | - |
| Width | 700 mm | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Weight balance - Front | - | 43.2 |
| Dry Weight | 111 kg / 244 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 7.7 L / 1.9 US gal | 9.70 litres / 2.56 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 202.0 kg / 445.3 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | - | 115.0 km/h / 71.5 mph |
| Acceleration (0-100 km/h) | - | 16.700 seconds |
| Max Power | 7.4 kW / 10 hp @ 5000 rpm | - |
| Max Torque | - | 17.00 |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | - | 2.4 x 2.3 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 62.0 x 58.4 mm |
| Displacement (cc) | - | 176.00 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | - | 10.74 cubic inches |
| Engine Type | - | Single cylinder |
| Stroke | - | 4 |
| Displacement | 198 cc / 12 cub in | - |
| Engine Detail | Two stroke, single cylinder | - |
| Fuel System | - | Injection |
| Bore x Stroke | 66.5 x 57 mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Cooling System | Air cooled, forced | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 4 L/100 km / 33 km/l / 78 US mpg | - |
| Fuel Mixture | 1:50 | - |
| Ignition | Electronic | - |
| Spark Plug | NGK B8ES or Bosch W4CC | - |
| Starter | Kick start | Electric |
| Valve System | - | 4 |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | 6V | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet, multiplate | - |
| Final Drive | Direct drive | Belt |
| Gear Ratios | 1st 13.42 / 2nd 9.13 / 3rd 6.32 / 4th 4.71:1 | - |
| Transmission / Drive | 4 Speed, grip-shift, constant mesh | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Pressed sheet steel, streamlined monocoque structure | - |
| Suspension - Front | Coil spring with hydraulic shock absorber, double effect | - |
| Suspension - Rear | Coil spring with hydraulic shock absorber, double effect | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 75 mm / 3.0 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 85 mm / 3.3 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Front | Drum, expanding type | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Drum, expanding type | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 100/90-10 | 120/70-13 |
| Tyres - Rear | 100/90/10 | 140/70-12 |
| Wheels | Interchangeable, split rim | - |
| Wheels - Front | 3.5 x 10" | - |
| Wheels - Rear | 3.5 x 10" | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2001 BMW C1 200
The 2001 BMW C1 200 edges out the 1992 Vespa 200 Cosa thanks to its fuel injection. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1992 Vespa 200 Cosa - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1992 Vespa 200 Cosa matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2001 BMW C1 200 - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
1992 Vespa 200 Cosa vs 2001 BMW C1 200 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1992 Vespa 200 Cosa and 2001 BMW C1 200?
The 1992 Vespa 200 Cosa uses Two stroke, single cylinder, while the 2001 BMW C1 200 is powered by Single cylinder.
Which should I buy, the 1992 Vespa 200 Cosa or the 2001 BMW C1 200?
Both are strong choices. The 1992 Vespa 200 Cosa has its own strengths, while the 2001 BMW C1 200 stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.