1959 Vespa 150 TAP vs 2001 BMW C1 200
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 1956 and 1959 | - |
| Make Model | Vespa 150 TAP | - |
| Total Produced | 500 units | - |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | - | 700 mm / 27.6 in. |
| Wheelbase | - | 1,488 mm / 58.6 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Weight balance - Front | - | 43.2 |
| Dry Weight | 115 kg / 253 lbs | - |
| Fuel Capacity | - | 9.70 litres / 2.56 gallons |
| Wet Weight | - | 202.0 kg / 445.3 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 60 km/h / 37mph | 115.0 km/h / 71.5 mph |
| Acceleration (0-100 km/h) | - | 16.700 seconds |
| Max Torque | - | 17.00 |
| Engine |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | - | 2.4 x 2.3 inches |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 62.0 x 58.4 mm |
| Engine Type | - | Single cylinder |
| Stroke | - | 4 |
| Displacement (cc) | - | 176.00 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | - | 10.74 cubic inches |
| Displacement | 145.5 cc / 8.8 cub in | - |
| Engine Detail | Two strike, single cylinder | - |
| Fuel System | - | Injection |
| Bore x Stroke | 58.5 x 54 mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | - | 11.5:1 |
| Cooling System | Air cooled, forced | - |
| Fuel Mixture | 1:20 | - |
| Ignition | 6 pole flywheel magneto | - |
| Starter | Kick start | Electric |
| Valve System | - | 4 |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | 6V | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Wet, multiplate with cork inserts | - |
| Final Drive | Direct drive | Belt |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Pressed sheet steel, streamlined monocoque structure | - |
| Suspension - Front | Helicoidal spring and hydraulic shock absorber | - |
| Suspension - Rear | Helicoidal spring and hydraulic shock absorber | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 75 mm / 3.0 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 85 mm / 3.3 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 8.7 inches |
| Brakes - Front | Drum, expanding type | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Drum, expanding type | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 3.5 x 8" | 120/70-13 |
| Tyres - Rear | 3.5 x 8" | 140/70-12 |
| Wheels | Interchangeable | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2001 BMW C1 200
The 2001 BMW C1 200 edges out the 1959 Vespa 150 TAP thanks to its fuel injection. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1959 Vespa 150 TAP - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1959 Vespa 150 TAP matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2001 BMW C1 200 - Advantages
- 🔧Fuel injection: Precise fuelling, better cold-start reliability, and lower maintenance requirements.
1959 Vespa 150 TAP vs 2001 BMW C1 200 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1959 Vespa 150 TAP and 2001 BMW C1 200?
The 1959 Vespa 150 TAP uses Two strike, single cylinder, while the 2001 BMW C1 200 is powered by Single cylinder.
Which should I buy, the 1959 Vespa 150 TAP or the 2001 BMW C1 200?
Both are strong choices. The 1959 Vespa 150 TAP has its own strengths, while the 2001 BMW C1 200 stands out for fuel injection. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.