2000 Suzuki SV 650 vs 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2000 Suzuki SV 650 2000 Suzuki SV 650

Naked bike

Engine
V2
Power
N/A
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Weight
372.6 pounds
2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer

Naked bike

Engine
Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Power
95 hp / 69.3 kW @ 11500 rpm (83.8hp @ 11.000rpm)
Top Speed
226 km/h
Weight
205 kg / 452 lbs
Full Specifications
General
Year-2003
ColoursYellow, blue-
Make Model-Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer
Dimensions
Seat Height805 mm / 31.7 in.790 mm / 31.1 in
Wheelbase1,420 mm / 55.9 in.1415 mm / 55.7 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight169 kg / 372.6 lbs189 kg / 416.6 lbs
Fuel Capacity16.00 litres / 4.23 gallons18 Litres / 4.7 US gal
Wet Weight-205 kg / 452 lbs
Performance
Top Speed200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph226 km/h
Braking (60 km/h - 0)-13.1 m / 38.3 m
Max Power-95 hp / 69.3 kW @ 11500 rpm (83.8hp @ 11.000rpm)
Max Power - Rear Tyre-83.8 hp / 62.4 kW @ 11.000rpm
Max Torque62.0061.2 Nm / 45.8 lb-ft @ 9500 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.4142 HP/kg-
Standing Start ¼ Mile-11.4 sec /191.6 km/h
Engine
Stroke4-
Engine TypeV2-
Displacement (ci)39.91 cubic inches-
Displacement (cc)654.00 cc-
Displacement-599 cc / 36.5 cu-in
Engine Detail-Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder.
Bore x Stroke-62 x 49.6 mm
Compression Ratio-12.0:1
Cooling System-Liquid cooled
Engine Oil Specification-Mineral, 10W/40
Fuel Induction-4x 38mm Mikuni BDSR carburetors
Ignition-TCI (transistor controlled Ignition)
Lubrication-Wet sump
Spark Plug-NGK, CR9E
StarterElectricElectric
Drivetrain
Clutch-Wet, multiple discs, cable operated
Final Drive-Chain
Gearbox6-speed-
Transmission / Drive-6 Speed
Chassis
Frame Type-Steel, Double cradle frame
Suspension - Front-41mm adjustable. forks preload adjustable
Suspension - Rear-Monoshock: adjustable preload
Wheel Travel - Front-120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - FrontSingle disc2x 298mm discs 4 piston calipers
Brakes - RearSingle discSingle 245mm disc 2 piston caliper
Tyres - Front-110/70-17
Tyres - Rear-160/60-17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2000 Suzuki SV 650

The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 edges out the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer thanks to its lighter kerb weight. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2000 Suzuki SV 650 - Advantages

  • Lighter: 169 kg vs 205 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.

2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer - Advantages

  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.

2000 Suzuki SV 650 vs 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 and 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer?
The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 uses V2, while the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer is powered by Four stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder..
Which is lighter, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer?
The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 is lighter at 169 kg compared to 205 kg for the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer - a difference of 36 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer?
The 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer has the lower seat at 790 mm, making it more accessible. The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 sits higher at 805 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2000 Suzuki SV 650 or the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer?
Both are strong choices. The 2000 Suzuki SV 650 has the edge in lighter kerb weight, while the 2003 Yamaha FZS 600 Fazer stands out for liquid cooling. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.