2016 KTM 65 SX vs 2013 Kawasaki KX65

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2016 KTM 65 SX 2016 KTM 65 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
53 kg / 116.8 lbs
2013 Kawasaki KX65 2013 Kawasaki KX65

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/white/blackLime Green
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)11.0 inches12.0 inches
Storage-Front and rear rack
Ground Clearance (mm)280 mm305 mm
Seat Height750 mm / 29.5 in.759 mm / 29.9 in.
Wheelbase1,137 mm / 44.8 in.1,120 mm / 44.1 in.
Height-955 mm / 37.6 in.
Length-1,590 mm / 62.6 in.
Width-759 mm / 29.9 in.
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight53 kg / 116.8 lbs-
Fuel Capacity3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons3.79 litres / 1.00 gallons
Wet Weight-60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs
Performance
Max Torque-59.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 5250 Revolutions
Engine
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Displacement (ci)3.96 cubic inches3.95 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)64.85 cc64.70 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)45.0 x 40.8 mm44.5 x 41.6 mm
Bore x Stroke (in,)1.8 x 1.6 inches1.8 x 1.6 inches
Fuel Control-Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Engine DetailReed intake.-
Fuel SystemCarburettorCarburettor. Mikuni VM24SS
Compression Ratio-8.4:1
Engine LubricationMixture oil lubrication-
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustmentDigital CDI
StarterKickElectric
Valve System-4
Drivetrain
ClutchWet, multi-disc clutch, Formula hydraulics-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive14:48. Primary drive: 23:75 straight cut spur gear.2WD / 4WD, shaft
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral-tube frame with double-cradleSemi-double-cradle, high-tensile steel
Suspension - FrontWP upside-down ? 35 mm33mm leading axle conventional fork with four-way rebound damping / 8.3 in.
Suspension - RearWP shock absorberUni-Trak single shock system with four-way rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 9.4
Rake25.5°27.0°
Trail-61 mm / 2.4 in.
Wheel Travel - Front215 mm / 8.5 in.-
Wheel Travel - Rear270 mm / 10.6 in.-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)160 mm-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)6.3 inches-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)198 mm200 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)7.8 inches7.9 inches
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers. Wave brake discs.Single disc
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers. Wave brake discs.Single disc
Tyres - Front-60/100-14
Tyres - Rear-80/100-12

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 Kawasaki KX65

The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 edges out the 2016 KTM 65 SX thanks to its greater ground clearance. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2016 KTM 65 SX - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2016 KTM 65 SX matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 Kawasaki KX65 - Advantages

  • More ground clearance: 305 mm vs 280 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.

2016 KTM 65 SX vs 2013 Kawasaki KX65 - FAQs

Which should I buy, the 2016 KTM 65 SX or the 2013 Kawasaki KX65?
Both are strong choices. The 2016 KTM 65 SX has its own strengths, while the 2013 Kawasaki KX65 stands out for greater ground clearance. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.