2013 KTM 65 SX vs 2017 Husqvarna TC 65

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2013 KTM 65 SX 2013 KTM 65 SX

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs
2017 Husqvarna TC 65 2017 Husqvarna TC 65

Cross / motocross

Engine
Single cylinder, two-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
53 kg / 116.8 lbs
Full Specifications
General
ColoursOrange/blackWhite/blue/yellow
Warranty-2 Years
Dimensions
Ground Clearance (in.)11.0 inches11.0 inches
Ground Clearance (mm)280 mm280 mm
Seat Height750 mm / 29.5 in.750 mm / 29.5 in.
Wheelbase1,137 mm / 44.8 in.1,137 mm / 44.8 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-0.90 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.06 quarts
Dry Weight55.5 kg / 122.4 lbs53 kg / 116.8 lbs
Fuel Capacity3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons
Engine
Bore x Stroke (in,)1.8 x 1.6 inches1.8 x 1.6 inches
Bore x Stroke (mm)45.0 x 40.8 mm45.0 x 40.8 mm
Engine TypeSingle cylinder, two-strokeSingle cylinder, two-stroke
Displacement (ci)3.96 cubic inches3.96 cubic inches
Displacement (cc)64.85 cc64.90 cc
Engine DetailReed intake.-
Engine LubricationMixture oil lubricationMixture oil lubrication
IgnitionContactless, controlled, fully electronic ignition system with digital ignition timing adjustmentAET digital EMS
StarterKickKick
Drivetrain
ClutchWet multi-disc clutch / hydraulically operated-
Final DriveChainChain
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary Drive14:48. Primary drive: 23:75 straight cut spur gear.-
Chassis
Frame TypeCentral tube frame of chrome molybdenum steel tubing, powder-coatedCentral-tube frame with double-cradle
Suspension - FrontWP ?Suspension USD ?35WP-USD, AER 35, 35 mm
Suspension - RearWP ?Suspension ?3614 BAVPWP shock absorber
Rake25.5°-
Wheel Travel - Front275 mm / 10.8 in.205 mm / 8.1 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear272 mm / 10.7 in.185 mm / 7.3 in.
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)7.8 inches7.8 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)198 mm198 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)6.3 inches6.3 inches
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)160 mm160 mm
Brakes - FrontSingle disc. Four-piston calipers.Single disc
Brakes - RearSingle disc. Two-piston calipers.Single disc
Rims-Mirroring the full size motocross range, the TC 65 uses lightweight, black anodised, aluminium rims providing the highest strength and reliability. The standard MAXXIS tyres provide progressive grip on a variety of different terrain.

Verdict

Winner on specs

2013 KTM 65 SX

The 2013 KTM 65 SX edges out the 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 thanks to its higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2013 KTM 65 SX - Advantages

  • More rear wheel travel: 272 mm vs 185 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 275 mm vs 205 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2017 Husqvarna TC 65 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2013 KTM 65 SX vs 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 - FAQs

Which should I buy, the 2013 KTM 65 SX or the 2017 Husqvarna TC 65?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 KTM 65 SX has the edge in higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel, while the 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.