2013 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2017 Husqvarna TC 65
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Colours | Lime Green | White/blue/yellow |
| Warranty | - | 2 Years |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 305 mm | 280 mm |
| Storage | Front and rear rack | - |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | 12.0 inches | 11.0 inches |
| Seat Height | 759 mm / 29.9 in. | 750 mm / 29.5 in. |
| Wheelbase | 1,120 mm / 44.1 in. | 1,137 mm / 44.8 in. |
| Height | 955 mm / 37.6 in. | - |
| Length | 1,590 mm / 62.6 in. | - |
| Width | 759 mm / 29.9 in. | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Oil Capacity (Quarts) | - | 0.06 quarts |
| Oil Capacity (l) | - | 0.90 litres |
| Dry Weight | - | 53 kg / 116.8 lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 3.79 litres / 1.00 gallons | 3.50 litres / 0.92 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 60.0 kg / 132.2 lbs | - |
| Performance |
| Max Torque | 59.00 Nm (6.0 kgf-m or 43.5 ft.lbs) @ 5250 Revolutions | - |
| Engine |
| Fuel Control | Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC) | - |
| Displacement (cc) | 64.70 cc | 64.90 cc |
| Displacement (ci) | 3.95 cubic inches | 3.96 cubic inches |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 1.8 x 1.6 inches | 1.8 x 1.6 inches |
| Engine Type | Single cylinder, two-stroke | Single cylinder, two-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 44.5 x 41.6 mm | 45.0 x 40.8 mm |
| Fuel System | Carburettor. Mikuni VM24SS | - |
| Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | - |
| Engine Lubrication | - | Mixture oil lubrication |
| Ignition | Digital CDI | AET digital EMS |
| Starter | Electric | Kick |
| Valve System | 4 | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Final Drive | Chain | Chain |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Primary Drive | 2WD / 4WD, shaft | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Semi-double-cradle, high-tensile steel | Central-tube frame with double-cradle |
| Suspension - Front | 33mm leading axle conventional fork with four-way rebound damping / 8.3 in. | WP-USD, AER 35, 35 mm |
| Suspension - Rear | Uni-Trak single shock system with four-way rebound damping and fully adjustable spring preload / 9.4 | WP shock absorber |
| Rake | 27.0° | - |
| Trail | 61 mm / 2.4 in. | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 205 mm / 8.1 in. |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 185 mm / 7.3 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | 7.9 inches | 7.8 inches |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | 200 mm | 198 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 160 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 6.3 inches |
| Brakes - Front | Single disc | Single disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rims | - | Mirroring the full size motocross range, the TC 65 uses lightweight, black anodised, aluminium rims providing the highest strength and reliability. The standard MAXXIS tyres provide progressive grip on a variety of different terrain. |
| Tyres - Front | 60/100-14 | - |
| Tyres - Rear | 80/100-12 | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2013 Kawasaki KX65
The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 edges out the 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 thanks to its greater ground clearance. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
2013 Kawasaki KX65 - Advantages
- 🏔️More ground clearance: 305 mm vs 280 mm - better clearance over rocks and obstacles.
2017 Husqvarna TC 65 - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
2013 Kawasaki KX65 vs 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 - FAQs
Which should I buy, the 2013 Kawasaki KX65 or the 2017 Husqvarna TC 65?
Both are strong choices. The 2013 Kawasaki KX65 has the edge in greater ground clearance, while the 2017 Husqvarna TC 65 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.