1992 Honda CBR 1000F vs 1983 BMW R 100RT vs 1983 BMW R 100RT
Full specifications comparison •
3 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | - | 1982 - 83 |
| Make Model | - | BMW R 100RT |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | - | 820 mm / 32.3 in |
| Wheelbase | - | 1465 mm / 57.67 in |
| Ground Clearance | - | 165 mm / 6.49 in |
| Height | - | 1465 mm / 57.67 in |
| Length | - | 2110 mm / 87 in |
| Width | - | 746 mm / 29.37 in |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.00 litres / 5.55 gallons | 24 Litres / 6.3 US gal |
| Wet Weight | 254.0 kg / 560.0 lbs | 238 Kg / 525 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph | 203 km/h / 126 mph |
| Max Power | - | 51 kW 70 hp @ 7000 rpm |
| Max Torque | - | 76 Nm / 7.7 kgf-m / 56 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm |
| Standing Start ¼ Mile | - | 13.8 sec / 153 km/h / 95 mph |
| Engine |
| Stroke | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Control | DOHC | OHV |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.0 x 2.1 inches | 3.7 x 2.8 inches |
| Engine Type | In-line four | Two cylinder boxer |
| Displacement (ci) | 60.90 cubic inches | 59.74 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 998.00 cc | 979.00 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 77.0 x 53.6 mm | 94.0 x 70.6 mm |
| Displacement | - | 980 cc 59.8 cu in |
| Engine Detail | - | Four stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 2 valves per cylinder |
| Bore x Stroke | - | 94 x 70.6 mm |
| Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Cooling System | - | Air cooled |
| Fuel Consumption | - | 5.1 L/100 km / 19.6 km/l / 46 US mpg |
| Fuel Induction | - | 2 x Constant depression carburettors, Bing 94/40/105 - 94/40/106 |
| Ignition | - | Battery ignition |
| Lubrication | - | Wet sump |
| Starter | - | Electric |
| Valve System | 4 | 2 |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | - | Bosch 0.6 hp (from 1978: 0.7 Kw) |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | - | Dry single plate, with diaphragm spring |
| Final Drive | Chain | Shaft |
| Final Drive Gear Ratio (Bevel/Crown Teeth) | - | 11 / 32 teeth or 10 / 32 teeth |
| Gear Ratios | - | 1st 3.38 / 2nd 2.43 / 3rd 1.93 / 4th 1.67 / 5th 1.50 |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | - | 5 Speed |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | - | Double sown tubs, dual cradle |
| Suspension - Front | - | Telescopic fork with hydraulic shock absorber. |
| Suspension - Rear | - | Long swinging arm with adjustable strut. |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 200 mm / 7.8 in |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | - | 125 mm / 4.9 in |
| Electrical Systems |
| Alternator | - | Bosch 12V/240 W |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | Dual disc | Dual disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 20/70-17 | 3.25-19 |
| Tyres - Rear | 170/60-17 | 4.00-18 |
| Wheel Ratio - Rear | - | 1:2.91 or 1:3.00 |
| Wheels - Front | - | 1.85 B 19 |
| Wheels - Rear | - | 2.75 C 18 |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
1983 BMW R 100RT
The 1983 BMW R 100RT edges out the 1992 Honda CBR 1000F thanks to its dual front discs. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1992 Honda CBR 1000F - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1992 Honda CBR 1000F matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
1983 BMW R 100RT - Advantages
- 💿Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.
1992 Honda CBR 1000F vs 1983 BMW R 100RT - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1992 Honda CBR 1000F and 1983 BMW R 100RT?
The 1992 Honda CBR 1000F uses In-line four, while the 1983 BMW R 100RT is powered by Two cylinder boxer.
Which should I buy, the 1992 Honda CBR 1000F or the 1983 BMW R 100RT?
Both are strong choices. The 1992 Honda CBR 1000F has its own strengths, while the 1983 BMW R 100RT stands out for dual front discs. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.