2017 BMW S 1000XR vs 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles
2017 BMW S 1000XR 2017 BMW S 1000XR

Sport

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
121 kW / 165 hp @ 11000 rpm
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
502.7 pounds
2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1

Sport

Engine
In-line four, four-stroke
Power
N/A
Top Speed
N/A
Weight
438.7 pounds
Full Specifications
General
CommentsSmall windscreen. Switchable ABS.Traction Control, Slide Control, Wheel Lift Control, Quickshifter, Launch Control, ABS, Unified Braking System.
Year2017-
ColoursRed, Blue, White/grey/redTech Black, Race Blu
Make ModelBMW S 1000XR-
Warranty-1 Year Limited Factory Warranty
Dimensions
Seat Height840 mm / 33.1 in856 mm / 33.7 in.
Wheelbase1548 mm / 60.9 in1,405 mm / 55.3 in.
Height1408 mm / 45.4 in1,151 mm / 45.3 in.
Length283 mm / 85.9 in2,055 mm / 80.9 in.
Width940 mm / 37.0 in691 mm / 27.2 in.
Weights & Capacities
Oil Capacity (l)-3.90 litres
Oil Capacity (Quarts)-0.26 quarts
Dry Weight178 kg / 392.4 lbs-
Fuel Capacity20 Litres / 5.2 US gal17.03 litres / 4.50 gallons
Wet Weight228 kg / 502.6 lbs199.0 kg / 438.7 lbs
Performance
Max Power121 kW / 165 hp @ 11000 rpm-
Max Torque112 Nm / 11.4 kgf-m / 83 lb-ft @ 9250 rpm112.40 Nm (11.5 kgf-m or 82.9 ft.lbs) @ 11500 Revolutions
Power-to-Weight Ratio0.8989 HP/kg-
Engine
Engine TypeIn-line four, four-strokeIn-line four, four-stroke
Bore x Stroke (in,)-3.1 x 2.0 inches
Displacement (cc)-998.00 cc
Bore x Stroke (mm)-79.0 x 50.9 mm
CO2-167.0 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)
Fuel ControlDouble Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)
Displacement (ci)-60.90 cubic inches
Displacement999 cc / 60.9 cu-in-
Engine DetailFour stroke, transverse four cylinder, DOHC, valve actuation via single rocker arms , 4 valves per cylinder, Intake/outlet mm 33.5/27.2Crossplane crankshaft technology. Titanium intake valves.
Fuel SystemInjection. Electronic InjectionInjection. Fuel Injection with YCC-T and YCC-I
Bore x Stroke80 x 49.7 mm-
Compression Ratio12.0:113.0:1
Cooling SystemLiquid cooled-
EmissionsClosed-loop 3-way catalytic converter-
Engine ManagementBMS-X-
Exhaust-Titanium Exhaust
Fuel Consumption-7.20 litres/100 km (13.9 km/l or 32.67 mpg)
Fuel Reserve4.00 litres / 1.06 gallons-
Ignition-TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
LubricationWet sump-
Mixture ControlElectronic injection, throttle valve 48 mm-
StarterElectricElectric
Valve System44
Drivetrain
ClutchMulti-disc anti-hopping oil-bath clutch, mechanically operatedMultiplate slipper clutch
Final DriveChainChain
Gear Ratios1st 2.647 / 2nd 2.091 / 3rd 1.727 / 4th 1.500 / 5th 1.360 / 6th 1.261-
Gearbox6-speed6-speed
Primary DriveChain 17/45O-ring chain
Primary Drive Ratios1.652-
Transmission / DriveConstant -mesh 6-speed gearbox, straight-toothed-
Chassis
Frame TypeConstruction type aluminium perimeter frame, engine self-supporting-
Suspension - FrontUpside-down telescopic fork, stanchion diameter 46 mm, adjustable for bump and rebound optional: Dynamic ESATelescopic forks, ? 43 mm
Suspension - RearAluminium double-strut swing arm with central spring strut, adjustable for rebound, optional: Dynamic ESASwingarm, (link suspension)
Rake25.5°24.0°
Steering Head Angle64.5°-
Trail117 mm / 4.6 in102 mm / 4.0 in.
Wheel Travel - Front150 mm / 5.9 in119 mm / 4.7 in.
Wheel Travel - Rear140 mm / 5.5 in119 mm / 4.7 in.
Electrical Systems
Electrical SystemAlternator W 350 Battery V/Ah 12/8, maintenance-free Headlight W low beam H7 12 V 55 W High beam H7 12 V 55 W Starter kW 0.8-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)265 mm220 mm
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)12.6 inches12.6 inches
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)320 mm320 mm
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)10.4 inches8.7 inches
Brakes - Front2 x 320 mm Discs, 4 piston calipers, ABS Pro (dynamic brake light currently for EU markets only).Double disc. ABS. Hydraulic. Four-piston calipers.
Brakes - RearSingle 220 mm disc, 1 piston caliper, ABS Pro (dynamic brake light currently for EU markets only).Single disc. ABS.
RimsCast Aluminium Wheels-
Tyres - Front120/70 ZR17120/70-ZR17
Tyres - Rear190/55 ZR17190/55-ZR17

Verdict

Winner on specs

2017 BMW S 1000XR

The 2017 BMW S 1000XR edges out the 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 thanks to its lower seat height, liquid cooling, higher rear wheel travel and higher front wheel travel. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.

Key Differences

2017 BMW S 1000XR - Advantages

  • Lower seat height: 840 mm vs 856 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
  • Liquid cooling: Consistent engine temperature in stop-start traffic and hot climates.
  • More rear wheel travel: 140 mm vs 119 mm - absorbs bigger hits and rough terrain better.
  • More front wheel travel: 150 mm vs 119 mm - greater compliance over rough surfaces.

2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 - Advantages

  • Competitive all-round: The 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.

2017 BMW S 1000XR vs 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 - FAQs

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2017 BMW S 1000XR or the 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1?
The 2017 BMW S 1000XR has the lower seat at 840 mm, making it more accessible. The 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 sits higher at 856 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.
Which should I buy, the 2017 BMW S 1000XR or the 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1?
Both are strong choices. The 2017 BMW S 1000XR has the edge in lower seat height and liquid cooling, while the 2017 Yamaha YZF-R1 offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.