1940 BMW R 35 vs 2023 GASGAS EC 250
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 1937 - 40 | - |
| Make Model | BMW R 35 | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | - | 356 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | - | 14 in. |
| Seat Height | - | 956 mm / 38 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 108 kg / 49 lbs. lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 12 liters / 3.1 US gal | 8 l / 2 gal. |
| Wet Weight | 155 kg / 351 lbs | - |
| Performance |
| Max Power | 10.4 kW / 14 hp @ 3500 rpm | - |
| Engine |
| Displacement (cc) | - | 249cc |
| Displacement (ci) | - | 15 cin. |
| Stroke | - | 2-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 66.4 mm x 72 mm |
| Displacement | 342 cc / 20.9 cu in. | - |
| Engine Detail | Four stroke, single cylinder vertical, OHV | Liquid cooled,249cc,1-cylinder |
| Bore x Stroke | 72 x 84 mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | - |
| Cooling System | Air cooled | - |
| Fuel Induction | 1 x SUM type C K 9/22 | - |
| Ignition | Bosch magneto ignition | - |
| Starter | Kick | Electric starter |
| Drivetrain |
| Chain Size | - | 520 X-Ring |
| Clutch | Single plate, dry | DDS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics |
| Final Drive | Shaft | - |
| Gear Ratios | 1st 3.4 / 2nd 2.18 / 3rd 1.35 / 4th 1.00:1 | - |
| Gearbox | - | 6-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | 4 Speed | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Pressed steel twin loop frame | Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel |
| Suspension - Front | Telescopic fork | WP XPLOR-USD,48 mm |
| Suspension - Rear | Rigid, spring loaded saddle | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 300 mm / 12 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9 in. |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 10 in. |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 260 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Front | ∅180mm Drum | Disc brake |
| Brakes - Rear | ∅180mm Drum | Disc brake |
| Tyres - Front | 3.0 x 19" | - |
| Tyres - Rear | 3.5 x 19" | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
1940 BMW R 35
The 1940 BMW R 35 edges out the 2023 GASGAS EC 250 thanks to its larger fuel tank and larger displacement. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1940 BMW R 35 - Advantages
- ⛽Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
- 🔩Larger displacement: 342 cc vs 249 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.
2023 GASGAS EC 250 - Advantages
- ⚖️Lighter: 108 kg vs 155 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
1940 BMW R 35 vs 2023 GASGAS EC 250 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1940 BMW R 35 and 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
The 1940 BMW R 35 uses Four stroke, single cylinder vertical, OHV, while the 2023 GASGAS EC 250 is powered by Liquid cooled,249cc,1-cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 1940 BMW R 35 or the 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
The 2023 GASGAS EC 250 is lighter at 108 kg compared to 155 kg for the 1940 BMW R 35 - a difference of 47 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 1940 BMW R 35 or the 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
The 1940 BMW R 35 has the larger tank at approximately 12 litres vs 8 litres for the 2023 GASGAS EC 250. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 200-240 km vs 133-160 km between stops.
Which should I buy, the 1940 BMW R 35 or the 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
Both are strong choices. The 1940 BMW R 35 has the edge in larger fuel tank and larger displacement, while the 2023 GASGAS EC 250 stands out for lighter kerb weight. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.