1960 BMW R 26 vs 2023 GASGAS EC 250
Full specifications comparison •
2 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 1956 - 60 | - |
| Make Model | BMW R 26 | - |
| Dimensions |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | - | 356 mm |
| Ground Clearance (in.) | - | 14 in. |
| Seat Height | - | 956 mm / 38 in. |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Dry Weight | - | 108 kg / 49 lbs. lbs |
| Fuel Capacity | 15 liters / US 3.9 gal | 8 l / 2 gal. |
| Wet Weight | 158 kg / 348 lb | - |
| Performance |
| Max Power | 11.2 kW / 15 hp @ 6400 rpm | - |
| Engine |
| Displacement (cc) | - | 249cc |
| Displacement (ci) | - | 15 cin. |
| Stroke | - | 2-stroke |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | - | 66.4 mm x 72 mm |
| Displacement | 247 cc / 15.1 cu in. | - |
| Engine Detail | Four stroke, single cylinder, pushrod operated, OHV, 2 valves per cylinder. | Liquid cooled,249cc,1-cylinder |
| Bore x Stroke | 68 x 68 mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | - |
| Cooling System | Air cooled | - |
| Fuel Induction | 1x Bing carburetor type 1/26/46 | - |
| Ignition | Battery ignition | - |
| Starter | Kick | Electric starter |
| Drivetrain |
| Chain Size | - | 520 X-Ring |
| Clutch | Single plate, dry | DDS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics |
| Final Drive | Shaft | - |
| Gear Ratios | 1st 5.33 / 2nd 3.02 / 3rd 2.04 / 4th 1.54:1 | - |
| Gearbox | - | 6-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | 4 Speed | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Steel twin loop frame, welded | Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel |
| Suspension - Front | Telescopic fork | WP XPLOR-USD,48 mm |
| Suspension - Rear | Long swing arm with suspension units and oil pressure dampers | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | - | 300 mm / 12 in. |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.) | - | 9 in. |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (in.) | - | 10 in. |
| Brakes - Front Diameter (mm) | - | 260 mm |
| Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm) | - | 220 mm |
| Brakes - Front | ∅160mm Drum | Disc brake |
| Brakes - Rear | ∅160mm Drum | Disc brake |
| Tyres - Front | 3.25 x 18" | - |
| Tyres - Rear | 3.25 x 18" | - |
Verdict
🏆
Winner on specs
2023 GASGAS EC 250
The 2023 GASGAS EC 250 edges out the 1960 BMW R 26 thanks to its lighter kerb weight. Specifications are one part of the picture - dealer support, parts availability, and intended use all matter too.
Key Differences
1960 BMW R 26 - Advantages
- ⛽Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
2023 GASGAS EC 250 - Advantages
- ⚖️Lighter: 108 kg vs 158 kg - easier to handle and less fatiguing on long trips.
1960 BMW R 26 vs 2023 GASGAS EC 250 - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1960 BMW R 26 and 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
The 1960 BMW R 26 uses Four stroke, single cylinder, pushrod operated, OHV, 2 valves per cylinder., while the 2023 GASGAS EC 250 is powered by Liquid cooled,249cc,1-cylinder.
Which is lighter, the 1960 BMW R 26 or the 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
The 2023 GASGAS EC 250 is lighter at 108 kg compared to 158 kg for the 1960 BMW R 26 - a difference of 50 kg. This is a meaningful difference that affects handling and rider fatigue.
Which has the larger fuel tank, the 1960 BMW R 26 or the 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
The 1960 BMW R 26 has the larger tank at approximately 15 litres vs 8 litres for the 2023 GASGAS EC 250. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 250-300 km vs 133-160 km between stops.
Which should I buy, the 1960 BMW R 26 or the 2023 GASGAS EC 250?
Both are strong choices. The 1960 BMW R 26 has the edge in larger fuel tank, while the 2023 GASGAS EC 250 stands out for lighter kerb weight. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.