1983 BMW R 100RT vs 1983 BMW R 100RT vs 1984 Honda VF 1000 R
Full specifications comparison •
3 motorcycles
Full Specifications
Differs
Same
| General |
| Year | 1982 - 83 | - |
| Make Model | BMW R 100RT | - |
| Dimensions |
| Seat Height | 820 mm / 32.3 in | - |
| Wheelbase | 1465 mm / 57.67 in | - |
| Ground Clearance | 165 mm / 6.49 in | - |
| Height | 1465 mm / 57.67 in | - |
| Length | 2110 mm / 87 in | - |
| Width | 746 mm / 29.37 in | - |
| Weights & Capacities |
| Fuel Capacity | 24.00 litres / 6.34 gallons | 25.00 litres / 6.61 gallons |
| Wet Weight | 260.0 kg / 573.2 lbs | 272.0 kg / 599.7 lbs |
| Performance |
| Top Speed | 179.0 km/h / 111.2 mph | - |
| Max Power | 51 kW 70 hp @ 7000 rpm | - |
| Max Torque | 76 Nm / 7.7 kgf-m / 56 ft-lb @ 6000 rpm | - |
| Standing Start ¼ Mile | 13.8 sec / 153 km/h / 95 mph | - |
| Engine |
| Stroke | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel Control | OHV | DOHC |
| Engine Type | Two cylinder boxer | V4 |
| Displacement (ci) | 59.74 cubic inches | 60.90 cubic inches |
| Displacement (cc) | 979.00 cc | 998.00 cc |
| Bore x Stroke (mm) | 94.0 x 70.6 mm | 77.0 x 53.6 mm |
| Bore x Stroke (in,) | 3.7 x 2.8 inches | 3.0 x 2.1 inches |
| Displacement | 980 cc 59.8 cu in | - |
| Engine Detail | Four stroke, two cylinder horizontally opposed Boxer, 2 valves per cylinder | - |
| Bore x Stroke | 94 x 70.6 mm | - |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Cooling System | Air cooled | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km / 19.6 km/l / 46 US mpg | - |
| Fuel Induction | 2 x Constant depression carburettors, Bing 94/40/105 - 94/40/106 | - |
| Ignition | Battery ignition | - |
| Lubrication | Wet sump | - |
| Starter | Electric | - |
| Valve System | 2 | 4 |
| EV Specifics |
| Battery Capacity | Bosch 0.6 hp (from 1978: 0.7 Kw) | - |
| Drivetrain |
| Clutch | Dry single plate, with diaphragm spring | - |
| Final Drive | Shaft | Chain |
| Final Drive Gear Ratio (Bevel/Crown Teeth) | 11 / 32 teeth or 10 / 32 teeth | - |
| Gear Ratios | 1st 3.38 / 2nd 2.43 / 3rd 1.93 / 4th 1.67 / 5th 1.50 | - |
| Gearbox | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Transmission / Drive | 5 Speed | - |
| Chassis |
| Frame Type | Double sown tubs, dual cradle | - |
| Suspension - Front | Telescopic fork with hydraulic shock absorber. | - |
| Suspension - Rear | Long swinging arm with adjustable strut. | - |
| Wheel Travel - Front | 200 mm / 7.8 in | - |
| Wheel Travel - Rear | 125 mm / 4.9 in | - |
| Electrical Systems |
| Alternator | Bosch 12V/240 W | - |
| Wheels & Brakes |
| Brakes - Front | 2 x ∅260mm discs, 2 piston calipers | Dual disc |
| Brakes - Rear | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tyres - Front | 3.25-19 | 120/80-16 |
| Tyres - Rear | 4.00-18 | 140/80-17 |
| Wheel Ratio - Rear | 1:2.91 or 1:3.00 | - |
| Wheels - Front | 1.85 B 19 | - |
| Wheels - Rear | 2.75 C 18 | - |
Verdict
⚖️
Too close to call
The 1983 BMW R 100RT and the 1983 BMW R 100RT are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.
Key Differences
1983 BMW R 100RT - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1983 BMW R 100RT matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
1983 BMW R 100RT - Advantages
- ✓Competitive all-round: The 1983 BMW R 100RT matches or exceeds its rival across all measured criteria.
1983 BMW R 100RT vs 1983 BMW R 100RT - FAQs
What are the engine differences between the 1983 BMW R 100RT and 1983 BMW R 100RT?
The 1983 BMW R 100RT uses Two cylinder boxer, while the 1983 BMW R 100RT is powered by V4.
Which should I buy, the 1983 BMW R 100RT or the 1983 BMW R 100RT?
Both are strong choices. The 1983 BMW R 100RT has its own strengths, while the 1983 BMW R 100RT offers a compelling alternative. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.