2016 BMW F 800R vs 2017 Triumph Street Twin

Full specifications comparison • 2 motorcycles

Comparing 2 motorcycles

Differences only

2016 BMW F 800R

Naked bike

Engine

Twin, four-stroke

Power

64 kW / 87 hp @ 8000 rpm

Top Speed

218 km/h / 135.5 mph

Weight

445.3 pounds

2017 Triumph Street Twin

Naked bike

Engine

Four stroke, 270° Crank angle parallel twin, SOHC, 8 valves

Power

40.5 kW / 55 hp @ 5900 rpm

Top Speed

N/A

Weight

198 kg / 437 lbs

Full Specifications

Differs Same

General
Year	2016	2016 - 17
Colours	Racing Blue Metallic Matte/Light White, Light White, Black Satin Gloss/Light White, Racing Blue Metallic Matte/Black Satin Gloss	Jet black, Crnberry red, Matt black, Phantom black, Aluminium silver
Make Model	BMW F 800R	Triumph Street Twin
Dimensions
Seat Height	800 mm / 31.5 in. (low seat: 775 mm / 30.5 in., high seat: 825 mm / 32.5 in)	750 mm / 29.5 in
Wheelbase	1,520 mm / 59.8 in.	1415 mm / 55.7 in
Height	1160 mm / 45.7 in (excl. mirrors)	1114 mm / 43.9 in (without mirrors)
Length	2145 mm / 84.4 in.	-
Width	905 mm / 35.6 in. (incl. mirrors)	785 mm / 30.9 in
Weights & Capacities
Dry Weight	177 kg / 390 lbs	198 kg / 437 lbs
Fuel Capacity	16 Litres / 4.2 US gal	12 L / 3.2 US gal / 2.7 Imp gal
Wet Weight	199 kg / 439 lbs.	-
Performance
Top Speed	218 km/h / 135.5 mph	-
Max Power	64 kW / 87 hp @ 8000 rpm	40.5 kW / 55 hp @ 5900 rpm
Max Torque	86 Nm / 8.8 kgf-m / 63 lbs/ft @ 6000 rpm	80 Nm / 8.16 kgf-m / 59 ft-lb @ 3230 rpm
Power-to-Weight Ratio	0.5085 HP/kg	-
Standing Start ¼ Mile	12.0 sec	-
Engine
Fuel Control	Double Overhead Cams/Twin Cam (DOHC)	-
Engine Type	Twin, four-stroke	-
CO2	83.5 CO2 g/km. (CO2 - Carbon dioxide emission)	-
Displacement	798 cc / 47.7 cub. in.	900 cc / 54.9 cu in
Engine Detail	Four stroke, parallel twin cylinder, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder	Four stroke, 270° Crank angle parallel twin, SOHC, 8 valves
Fuel System	Injection. Electronic intake pipe injection / digital engine management (BMS-KP)	-
Bore x Stroke	82 x 75.8 mm	84.6 x 80 mm
Compression Ratio	12.0:1	10.55:1
Cooling System	Liquid cooled	Liquid cooled
Emissions	Closed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard EU-3	-
Engine Lubrication	Dry sump	-
Exhaust	Closed-loop 3-way catalytic converter, emission standard	Brushed stainless steel, 2 into 2 exhaust system with twin silencers
Fuel Consumption	6.1 L/100 km / 16.4 km/l / 38.6 US mpg	3.87 L/100 km / 25.8 km/l / 60.8 US mpg / 73.0 Imp mpg
Fuel Induction	Electronic injection, digital engine electronics (BMS-KP)	Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Fuel Reserve	3.00 litres / 0.79 gallons	-
Ignition	Knock control and oxygen sensors.	Digital
Lubrication	Wet sump	Wet sump
Starter	Electric	Electric
Valve System	4	-
EV Specifics
Battery Capacity	12 V / 14 Ah, maintenance-free	-
Drivetrain
Clutch	Multi-plate clutch in oil bath, mechanically operated	Wet, multi-plate, slip-assist
Final Drive	Chain	Chain, X-ring
Gear Ratios	1st 2.462 / 2nd 1.750 / 3rd 1.381 / 4th 1.227 / 5th 1.130 / 6th 1.042: 1	-
Gearbox	6-speed	-
Primary Drive	O-ring chain with shock damping in rear wheel hub	-
Transmission / Drive	6 Speed	5-Speed
Chassis
Frame Type	Bridge frame made aluminium, load-supporting engine	Tubular steel cradle, twin-sided tubular steel swing-arm
Suspension - Front	43mm Telescopic fork	Kayaba 41 mm fork
Suspension - Rear	Cast aluminium double-sided swing arm, central, suspension strut, spring pre-tension by means of hand	Kayaba twin shocks with adjustable preload
Rake	25°	25.1°
Trail	91 mm / 3.6 in.	102.4 mm / 4.0 in
Wheel Travel - Front	125 mm / 4.9 in.	120 mm / 4.7 in
Wheel Travel - Rear	125 mm / 4.9 in.	120 mm / 4.7 in
Electrical Systems
Alternator	Three-phase alternator 400 W	-
Wheels & Brakes
Brakes - Front Diameter (in.)	12.6 inches	-
Brakes - Front Diameter (mm)	320 mm	-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (in.)	10.4 inches	-
Brakes - Rear Diameter (mm)	265 mm	-
Brakes - Front	2 x 320mm discs, 4 piston calipers	Single 310mm disc, Nissin 2 piston floating caliper, ABS
Brakes - Rear	Single 265mm disc, 1 piston caliper	Single 255mm disc, Nissin 2 piston floating caliper, ABS
Rims	Cast aluminium	-
Tyres - Front	120/70 ZR17	100/90-R18
Tyres - Rear	180/55 ZR17	150/70-R17
Wheels	Cast aluminium	-
Wheels - Front	3.50 x 17"	2.75 x 18, Cast aluminium alloy, multi-spoke
Wheels - Rear	5.50 x 17"	4.25 x 17, Cast aluminium alloy, multi-spoke

Verdict

Too close to call

The 2016 BMW F 800R and the 2017 Triumph Street Twin are evenly matched across the key measurable criteria. Your decision comes down to personal preference, riding style, and which brand's dealer network best suits your location.

Key Differences

2016 BMW F 800R - Advantages

Higher torque: 86 Nm vs 80 Nm - more pulling power across the rev range.
Larger fuel tank: More range between stops - an advantage on touring routes and remote roads.
Dual front discs: Greater stopping power and better heat management under hard braking.

2017 Triumph Street Twin - Advantages

Lower seat height: 750 mm vs 800 mm - accessible to a wider range of rider heights.
Larger displacement: 900 cc vs 798 cc - more cubic capacity means broader torque delivery and greater low-end pull.

2016 BMW F 800R vs 2017 Triumph Street Twin - FAQs

What are the engine differences between the 2016 BMW F 800R and 2017 Triumph Street Twin?

The 2016 BMW F 800R uses Twin, four-stroke, while the 2017 Triumph Street Twin is powered by Four stroke, 270° Crank angle parallel twin, SOHC, 8 valves.

Which bike is better for shorter riders, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2017 Triumph Street Twin?

The 2017 Triumph Street Twin has the lower seat at 750 mm, making it more accessible. The 2016 BMW F 800R sits higher at 800 mm. A seat height below 800 mm suits most riders; above 820 mm shorter riders may need to tiptoe.

Which has the larger fuel tank, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2017 Triumph Street Twin?

The 2016 BMW F 800R has the larger tank at approximately 16 litres vs 12 litres for the 2017 Triumph Street Twin. At 5-6 l/100 km that is roughly 266-320 km vs 200-240 km between stops.

Which should I buy, the 2016 BMW F 800R or the 2017 Triumph Street Twin?

Both are strong choices. The 2016 BMW F 800R has the edge in higher torque and larger fuel tank, while the 2017 Triumph Street Twin stands out for lower seat height and larger displacement. Visit dealers, arrange test rides, and factor in local parts and service costs - these often matter as much as the spec sheet.

Related Comparisons

All BMW F 800R years All Triumph Street Twin years

Build your own comparison →